Member-only story
The Paradox of Power
How Might Shapes the Perception of Justice and Fairness
Introduction
From our earliest days in school, we were taught that fairness and justice are fundamental principles that underpin our society. We grew up believing that right would prevail over wrong, and that the scales of justice would always tip in favor of the virtuous. However, the harsh realities of the world often paint a different picture, where might seems to dictate what is just and what is fair. It is the powerful who have the ability to shape these concepts, determine who is right and who is wrong, and even write the history books that we read. This paradox, the idea that might is right, has been a recurrent theme throughout human history, and it continues to shape our understanding of justice and fairness in the present day.
The Power to Define Justice and Fairness
The concept that might is right is deeply rooted in human history. Throughout the ages, those with the most power and influence have often been the ones to define and impose their notions of justice and fairness on society. In ancient civilizations, rulers and monarchs were not just political leaders but also moral authorities, shaping the very fabric of societal values. They could determine what actions were deemed virtuous or sinful, and their might allowed them to enforce these beliefs on their subjects.
In medieval times, the church held immense power, and its interpretation of religious texts played a pivotal role in defining what was just and fair. The church’s might was not only spiritual but also political, allowing it to shape laws, regulations, and social norms. Consequently, religious leaders held the authority to decide what was morally right or wrong.
The Influence of Colonization
The might-is-right paradigm is strikingly evident in the history of colonization. European powers, driven by their military and economic might, imposed their version of justice and fairness upon the indigenous peoples they encountered. They justified their conquests by depicting themselves as superior and enlightened, while portraying the colonized as primitive and in need of their “civilizing” influence.
